Current Issue

Volume 35, Number 1 – Winter 2012

CAPITALISM, MARKETS, AND THE CONSTITUTION:
THE THIRTIETH ANNUAL FEDERALIST SOCIETY NATIONAL STUDENT SYMPOSIUM ON LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY — 2011

I. ECONOMIC FREEDOMS AND THE CONSTITUTION

5  DOES THE CONSTITUTION PROTECT ECONOMIC LIBERTY?

Randy E. Barnett

13  ECONOMIC FREEDOMS AND THE CONSTITUTION

Jeffrey Rosen

II. ECONOMIC THEORY, CIVIC VIRTUE, AND THE MEANING OF THE CONSTITUTION

27  THE CONSTITUTION AND ECONOMIC LIBERTY

James W. Ely Jr.

37  ENLIGHTENMENT ECONOMICS AND THE FRAMING OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION

Renée Lettow Lerner

47  JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE, JUDICIAL VIRTUE, AND THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF THE CONSTITUTION

Nelson Lund

61  THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF THE ORIGINAL CONSTITUTION

G. Edward White

III. FEDERALISM AND INTERSTATE COMPETITION

89  INTERSTATE COMPETITION AND THE RACE TO THE TOP

Jonathan H. Adler

101  FISCAL FEDERALISM AS A CONSTRAINT ON STATES

Clayton P. Gillette

115  FEDERALISM AS A DISCOVERY PROCESS AND A CATALYST FOR HUMILITY

John O. McGinnis

121  DEPOLITICIZING FEDERALISM

Louis Michael Seidman

IV. THE WELFARE STATE AND AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALISM

131  NATIONAL HEALTHCARE AND AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL CULTURE

William P. Marshall

153  AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALISM AND THE HEALTHCARE REFORM DEBATE

Jeremy Rabkin

171  AMERICAN DIGNITY AND HEALTHCARE REFORM

Neomi Rao

V. ECONOMIC UNCERTAINTY AND THE ROLE OF THE COURTS

187  ECONOMIC UNCERTAINTY AND THE ROLE OF THE COURTS

Paul G. Mahoney

195  ECONOMIC UNCERTAINY, THE COURTS, AND THE RULE OF LAW

Todd Zywicki

REFLECTIONS ON THE LAW OF SEPTEMBER 11: A TEN-YEAR RETROSPECTIVE

213  DEFERENCE TO THE EXECUTIVE IN THE UNITED STATES AFTER SEPTEMBER 11: CONGRESS, THE COURTS, AND THE OFFICE OF LEGAL COUNSEL

Eric A. Posner

245  U.S. INTELLIGENCE IN THE WAKE OF SEPTEMBER 11: THE RISE OF THE SPY COMMANDO AND REORGANIZED OPERATIONAL CAPABILITIES

Frederick P. Hitz

ESSAY

259  WHAT WOULD HAMILTON DO?

Michael W. McConnell

ARTICLES

283  IN DEFENSE OF SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS, OR THE PROMISE OF LAWFUL RULE

Timothy Sandefur

351  IN PRAISE OF HOSTILITY: ANTIAUTHORITARIANISM AS FREE SPEECH PRINCIPLE

John M. Kang

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

423  STATE LAW CLAIMS AND ARTICLE III IN Stern v. Marshall, 131 S. Ct. 2594 (2011)
439  MAINTAINING THE CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE STANDARD FOR PATENT INVALIDITY CHALLENGES IN Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Limited Partnership, 131 S. Ct. 2238 (2011)

SPECIAL THANKS

 SYMPOSIUM MASTHEAD

Comments Off